Thoughts on U.S.-China Relations and the Importance of the Fellowship

Recently, Nancy Yao Maasbach wrote to all of us to ask for our thoughts on the greatest unmet opportunities, the most significant blind spot, and the next generation of engagement in the U.S.-China relationship.  Here are the thoughts I shared with her; feel free to add your own in the comments section:

I think the most significant blind spot today in the U.S.-China relationship is opportunism, and that the next generation of U.S.-China relations must take on forms that transcend opportunism and drive directly at building trust.  Too much of the exchange that happens these days is distracted by motives other than building trust, yet trust is the outcome we all hope for in the long run.  Americans set up businesses in China to make money, Chinese graduate students come to the U.S. to study, young Americans go to China to teach English, Chinese professionals come to the U.S. for career development, and all along the way it seems we expect these pursuits to lead to trust and respect, but trust and respect are not things that we can stumble onto by accident.  Investing, studying, teaching, and training carry enough challenges of their own – there is only so much mutual trust that will come about as a byproduct of these activities.  We need people to take a step back and think about the larger context of cross-cultural interaction and take time to unclamp their minds enough to truly open them to new ideas – not just new foods, new language, new holidays; otherwise, we have a relationship built solely on the success of business, on a deficit in the Chinese educational system vis-a-vis the U.S., on the status quo.  If we first understand each other, things can change – things can even go wrong – without the whole relationship collapsing.  And if we establish this foundation, all those other pursuits – business, education, even tourism – will have so much more potential for success.

This, of course, relates back to the diagram I showed you and the thinking we are developing for the fellowship, where we zoom the lens out from just teaching and look at the broader bilateral impact that can be had.  It is amazing to me to meet people who have spent far more time in China (or in the U.S.) than Yale-China Fellows spend at their sites, yet have far less understanding to show for it than any Fellow – and I run into these people all the time, whether it’s in the business class lounge at the airport or another teacher at the CTC conference.

Trust and understanding that can stand independent of other interests – something you might call friendship, or even family – this is the great need that is the essence of the next step that needs to be taken in the U.S.-China relationship.  Not everyone has recognized this need yet, since not everyone realizes that there is a level of trust to be built beyond the ad hoc trust that can arise through a business venture or a university enrollment, but those who have had the chance to break through that barrier can appreciate the difference so clearly, and we need more of these people to spread the word and help others realize there is more to learn.  This is why we are so proud of what the Fellows do – they are the vanguard of this next generation.

Natural vs. Standard, Descriptive vs. Proscriptive

This “Ask the Editor” clip from Merriam-Webster provides some great food for thought on natural versus prescriptive language, what is “correct,” and how a language authority figure (whether dictionary editor or foreign English teacher) can and should balance the two.

Remember that natural language is language as acquired and produced by humans’ natural cognitive abilities – i.e. what people actually say.  Prescriptive language imposes [often arbitrary] rules that do not exist in natural language, but it is the only kind of language that is acceptable in writing for all but the most informal/unorthodox/creative settings.

 

YCTB Vol. 1 No. 7 Introduction

This month I have a link to share:
http://www.economist.com/content/chinese_equivalents
It’s a map of China that shows the GDP of each province; they have also listed a country with a similar-sized economy for each province.

I hope you all were able to get your tickets to Huangshan without any trouble. See you in Xiuning next week!

HKU China Media Project

 by Brendan Woo
I heard about this website at a talk given at CUHK by Prof. David Skidmore of Drake University. It’s essentially a news translation project run by Hong Kong University, and has a lot of interesting features, including a “media dictionary,” which highlights the nuances of various Chinese terms appearing in the news.

This could be a great way to keep up with Chinese news if your Mandarin reading level isn’t up to the newspaper standard yet! Here’s the link:
http://cmp.hku.hk/

YCTB Vol. 1 No. 5 Introduction

Introduction    by Brendan Woo
Happy New Year!

Here are a couple things of interest I have to share, which cover life’s two inevitabilities (death and taxes):

Taxes:
You have 92 days left to file your tax returns! As filing my taxes has become somewhat of a hobby[sic] for me, here are some resources that will allow you, too, to join in on the fun!
IRS website for international taxpayers
-If your income is below a certain level (if Fellowship-related income was your main source of cash in 2010, you definitely qualify), you can choose from a list of tax preparation software companies that will help you prepare your taxes without charging the usual fees. Federal tax preparation is free, as is preparation for tax returns in certain states. I have used TurboTax Freedom Edition (one of the choices on the list) for several years now, and have been pleased with their software (all web-based), which walks you through all the steps, does the cross-referencing and calculating, and has answers to questions along the way. The IRS and state governments generally have their own e-file options, too, but they offer less guidance than the commercial options.

Smoking:
I happened across this articlethe other day, which offers statistical support to a different approach to anti-smoking messages: it’s bad for the economy! Excerpt:

The health and other costs of smoking already exceed the tobacco industry’s economic contributions by at least $9 billion, said a report prepared by a group of prominent Chinese public health experts and economists.

If trends continue, by 2030 an estimated 3.5 million Chinese will die from smoking each year — three times the current level, it said, citing China’s failure to take basic measures such as passing a national law to ban smoking in indoor public places and raising the price of cigarettes.

However, last year, authorities did instruct kindergartens and elementary, secondary and vocational schools to ban smoking on school grounds and bar teachers from lighting up in front of students.

How well is that last part going?

Safe travels to everyone as you ring in (?) the year of the rabbit!

YCTB Vol. 1 No. 2 Introduction

Introduction    by Brendan Woo
The second edition has arrived! I have a couple things to share with you:

  • Public Internet Security – Especially if you’re on the road, be careful about what you’re sending out into the air from your computer. Remember that if a wireless network has no password, then anyone can (fairly easily) intercept the data you’re transmitting. Steps such as using the VPN, using WPA wireless encryption (i.e. adding a password to your network), and using a secure connection on Gmail can keep your personal information safer. This article and related ones on the same site have some tips.
  • Syntactic Structures Database – A little technical, but it might be interesting to take a look a this database that compares the structural grammar of the world’s languages: http://sswl.railsplayground.net/

Remember to start working on your Share Fair presentations, and I’ll see you in Changsha for conference (if not before)!