Thoughts on U.S.-China Relations and the Importance of the Fellowship

Recently, Nancy Yao Maasbach wrote to all of us to ask for our thoughts on the greatest unmet opportunities, the most significant blind spot, and the next generation of engagement in the U.S.-China relationship.  Here are the thoughts I shared with her; feel free to add your own in the comments section:

I think the most significant blind spot today in the U.S.-China relationship is opportunism, and that the next generation of U.S.-China relations must take on forms that transcend opportunism and drive directly at building trust.  Too much of the exchange that happens these days is distracted by motives other than building trust, yet trust is the outcome we all hope for in the long run.  Americans set up businesses in China to make money, Chinese graduate students come to the U.S. to study, young Americans go to China to teach English, Chinese professionals come to the U.S. for career development, and all along the way it seems we expect these pursuits to lead to trust and respect, but trust and respect are not things that we can stumble onto by accident.  Investing, studying, teaching, and training carry enough challenges of their own – there is only so much mutual trust that will come about as a byproduct of these activities.  We need people to take a step back and think about the larger context of cross-cultural interaction and take time to unclamp their minds enough to truly open them to new ideas – not just new foods, new language, new holidays; otherwise, we have a relationship built solely on the success of business, on a deficit in the Chinese educational system vis-a-vis the U.S., on the status quo.  If we first understand each other, things can change – things can even go wrong – without the whole relationship collapsing.  And if we establish this foundation, all those other pursuits – business, education, even tourism – will have so much more potential for success.

This, of course, relates back to the diagram I showed you and the thinking we are developing for the fellowship, where we zoom the lens out from just teaching and look at the broader bilateral impact that can be had.  It is amazing to me to meet people who have spent far more time in China (or in the U.S.) than Yale-China Fellows spend at their sites, yet have far less understanding to show for it than any Fellow – and I run into these people all the time, whether it’s in the business class lounge at the airport or another teacher at the CTC conference.

Trust and understanding that can stand independent of other interests – something you might call friendship, or even family – this is the great need that is the essence of the next step that needs to be taken in the U.S.-China relationship.  Not everyone has recognized this need yet, since not everyone realizes that there is a level of trust to be built beyond the ad hoc trust that can arise through a business venture or a university enrollment, but those who have had the chance to break through that barrier can appreciate the difference so clearly, and we need more of these people to spread the word and help others realize there is more to learn.  This is why we are so proud of what the Fellows do – they are the vanguard of this next generation.

China went from being a closed system with open minds to an open system with closed minds

China went from being a closed system with open minds to an open system with closed minds

December 5, 2012 1 Comment

Originally published December 3, 2012 (Quartz.com)

http://jamesmcgregor-inc.com/2012/12/05/china-went-from-being-a-closed-system-with-open-minds-to-an-open-system-with-closed-minds/

 

xi-ap-photo-yves-logghe1
Communist Party Chairman Xi Jinping must learn to appreciate outsiders’ contributions to China too. AP Photo / Yves Logghe

When I first visited China in 1985, the country was a blur of bicycles, blue Mao suits and impatient curiosity. As my sister Lisa and I backpacked across the country, we were besieged by people of all ages who wanted to practice English and quiz us about the world beyond their borders.

China was a closed system with rapidly opening minds. Today, China is a much more open system with some purposely closing minds.

China has advanced at a dizzying pace in the 23 years I’ve lived in Beijing. Foreign investment and its workshop-of-the-world export prowess have created incredible wealth and made China the world’s second largest economy.

According to a thorough new study by Associated Press writers Joe McDonald and Youkyung Lee, China is fast replacing the US as the top trading partner for countries large and small:

As recently as 2006, the U.S. was the larger trading partner for 127 countries, versus just 70 for China. By last year the two had clearly traded places: 124 countries for China, 76 for the U.S. In the most abrupt global shift of its kind since World War II, the trend is changing the way people live and do business from Africa to Arizona, as farmers plant more soybeans to sell to China and students sign up to learn Mandarin. The findings show how fast China has ascended to challenge America’s century-old status as the globe’s dominant trader, a change that is gradually translating into political influence. They highlight how pervasive China’s impact has been, spreading from neighboring Asia to Africa and now emerging in Latin America, the traditional U.S. backyard.

So how is China preparing it citizens to become global leaders? By preserving ancient habits and purposely stifling knowledge while instructing its citizens to become the world’s most creative thinkers. The Party is pushing its behemoth state-owned enterprises to “go global” and beat the leading multinationals as it exhorts scientists and entrepreneurs to transform China into a technology and innovation powerhouse.

At the same time, the ancient tradition of Yumin Zhengce (愚民政策, keeping the masses ignorant so they will follow the leaders) is still at the core of Chinese education and propaganda. In the days of Qin Shihuang, the first emperor, the idea was that an ignorant population would focus on agriculture, thereby providing the solid economic base needed to defend against invaders and conquer enemies. As Shang Yang (390-338 BC), a prominent scholar and statesman during that period put it: 民愚则易治也 (minyuzeyi zhidian, an ignorant populace is easy to rule).

The Chinese people today are anything but easy to rule. They are informed and often indignant about what is happening in China thanks to the internet and social media, despite pervasive and sophisticated censorship. But they are much less informed about or focused on international affairs. To distract from out-of-control corruption, gaping income disparities and a litany of inequities resulting from the lack of rule of law and breakneck growth, the Party blames most of the country’s problems on “foreign forces” that are determined to quash China’s rightful rise. Inflation? US Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke’s quantitative easing. Resource and territory disputes with neighbors? American manipulation and encirclement.

The Party refined this victimization narrative for the October 2009 60th birthday of the People’s Republic. The vehicle was the “Road of Rejuvenation,” a Broadway-style show with some 3,200 performers singing and dancing their way through 170 years of Chinese history, from the mid-1800s Opium Wars to the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Rag-clad peasants staggered under crates overflowing with gold bars destined for foreign ships. Electronic waterfalls of blood dripped down the theatre walls as hundreds of Chinese corpses stacked like timber came alive to rise up and vanquish Japanese invaders.

The storyline is simple. China was a glorious place until the foreigners came to exploit and humiliate. And China is regaining past greatness because the Party protects the country from foreigners who remain determined to keep China poor and dependent.

On Nov. 29, newly installed Communist Party Chairman Xi Jinping brought the six members of his top leadership team (his colleagues on the Politburo Standing Committee) to visit the “Road of Rejuvenation” exhibit at the National Museum bordering Tiananmen Square. After “carefully examining the exhibits,” according to Xinhua, Xi said that “we have to continue taking this road, unswervingly.” But he stressed the positive instead of stewing in victimization: ”I believe that by the time when the Communist Party of China marks its 100th founding anniversary, the goal to complete the building of a moderately prosperous society in all respects will be inevitably achieved.”

It is gratifying to see Xi begin his decade-long term as China’s top ruler trying to stress a positive vision. For Chinese people to be comfortable with the country’s role as a global leader, Xi will have to sideline the anti-foreign rhetoric that is the core of today’s foreign policy propaganda.

It is a pity that his Party’s censorship strictures will make it difficult for Xi to get his hands on the new book “Restless Empire” by historian Odd Arne Westad.

In a Washington Post review this weekend, veteran China watcher John Pomfret says the book “tells the story of the foreigners who helped China become what it is today, from China’s first interactions with the West to the current era. In doing so, Westad upends, but ever so politely, a slew of misconceptions about China that have been concocted by his academic predecessors both in the West and in Asia.”

…despite claims by communist historians, foreigners were key to China’s modernization. British, Americans, Japanese, Germans and Russians played enormously important roles as advisers, models, teachers, guides and enlighteners of the Chinese. While Westad does not underplay the depredations meted out by the imperialist powers, he also tells the other side of that story — that American missionaries brought education, science and modern medicine to China, that the British imported modern administrative techniques, that the Germans taught the Chinese a significant amount about warfare. Heck, the French even created China’s postal service.

Pomfret also directly contrasts the book with his own visit to the “Road of Rejuvenation” exhibit.

(Westad’s) book will not be published in China because a mainland publisher demanded too many cuts. And that’s important, because how China frames its past weighs on how it will face our common future. I recently visited the permanent exhibition on China’s rise at the newly renovated National Museum of China on Tiananmen Square: “The Road of Rejuvenation.” Foreign contributions — other than those from Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin — are nowhere to be found. Panel by panel, a story emerges of murder, rape and pillage by one Western army after another in a totally distorted netherworld of humiliation and pain. The operative sentiment I felt on leaving the exhibition was: “Earth to the Chinese Communist Party, grow up.” Reading Westad would be a good place to start.

I just downloaded the book and look forward to reading it. I hope Xi also finds his way to a copy.

Redefining the Meaning of ‘Chinese’

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/24/world/asia/24iht-letter24.html

Redefining the Meaning of ‘Chinese’

By DIDI KIRSTEN TATLOW

TAINAN — Taiwan and its 23 million people will eventually be absorbed by China, which claims it as a breakaway province, by a process of economic osmosis. So runs the conventional wisdom among many businessmen, and some diplomats.

Or will it? Instead of China changing Taiwan, might Taiwan change China?

Taiwan has a powerful weapon at its disposal: an inclusive national identity that absorbs and celebrates difference, said Mark Harrison, a Taiwan specialist at the University of Tasmania.

“Taiwan is actually very significant in terms of China’s future,” Dr. Harrison said. “It points the way to a politics of identity-making.”

Because what China cannot seem to do — and probably not for a long time yet — is this: build a broadly attractive definition of what it means to be “Chinese” for all its various ethnic groups, including the increasingly restive Tibetans and Uighurs, and thereby genuinely bring together the different voices within its borders, Dr. Harrison said.

Tied to that: It cannot, for now, show the world that a Chinese society can be open, tolerant and democratic. But Taiwan can.

That inclusiveness is clearly on display in Taiwan’s open news media, culture and academia, but also here, in the southern city of Tainan, where the decade-old National Museum of Taiwan Literature celebrates a rich range of narratives from the cultures that make up the island’s highly diverse history.

In a handsome, brick-and-column building dating from 1916, designed by the Japanese architect Moriyama Matsunosuke and beautifully updated since, dozens of voices are documented in exhibitions: the indigenous Austronesians; native speakers of Taiyu, a local language; Dutch colonial rulers of the 17th century; the Chinese of the late Ming and the Qing dynasties who sailed over from the mainland; the Japanese colonists; and the Chinese Nationalists who retreated to Taiwan in 1949 after their defeat to the Communists in the civil war.

For a longtime resident of Beijing, the capital of a state that stresses a rigid vision of national identity and tries to restrict the spread of even its major regional languages, like Cantonese, a visit to this museum was electrifying.

Here is the story of a “Chinese” state — Taiwanese, in reality — that celebrates the existence of different, critical voices, and freely admits the mistakes of the past, when it tried to smother them. It even offers some exhibits in digraphia, a mixture of Chinese characters and the Latin alphabet that some scholars, both Chinese and non-Chinese, say is important for modernizing Chinese, but is rejected by a Beijing government intent on preserving linguistic “purity.”

All this offers a lesson for China, said Dr. Harrison, as it faces dissatisfaction from peoples in the vast border regions of Tibet and Xinjiang.

“Somehow the Chinese need to let the Tibetans and Uighurs feel they are Chinese, they need to rethink their identity in a way that makes that possible, and I think the Taiwanese show how it can be done,” he said. “But the Chinese government doesn’t even begin to think in those terms. They take a colonial view, ‘We’re doing so much for these people, why aren’t they satisfied?”’

“For the Chinese, being Chinese is an objective fact. You can’t become Chinese. You are born it. But for the Taiwanese there’s the possibility of choosing to be Taiwanese,” a process that allows meaningful cultural differences while being a part of the nation, he said.

“Their attitude is, ‘We’re all here now on this island, we have to learn to live together, we must all be Taiwanese,”’ he said. “It’s a postcolonial identity. Inclusive. Open.” He calls it the Formosan voice, after the Portuguese name for the island of Taiwan.

Things weren’t always like that here. For decades after 1949, the Nationalists, who harked back to their mainland China roots, ruled with an iron fist. Yet the process of identity-building was fermenting below the surface. It gathered speed after the lifting of martial law in 1987 and for the past 20 years has been in high gear.

For sure, Dr. Harrison added, “There are a lot of other voices that are yet to be really heard, including migrant workers and expatriates. But it’s being shaped.”

No one is expecting China to start listening to Taiwan anytime soon. After trying military threats to intimidate the island into reunification, for the past decade under President Hu Jintao, China has offered financial incentives and increased trade to encouraged re-unification, dubbed by some “hongbao” diplomacy, a reference to the Chinese custom of giving red packets with money on special occasions like weddings.

Yet it’s not impossible that one day, China will be faced with such severe problems trying to hold together a state that is based on the borders of the last imperial dynasty and negotiating the disparate interests therein, that it may start looking to Taiwan for some answers.

“What Taiwan says is that there is nothing immutable about being Chinese, and there are a lot of other ways of thinking about being Chinese that are beyond the nationalism of the People’s Republic of China,” Dr. Harrison said. That model could eventually convince ethnic minorities that they are truly equal members of the Chinese state.

If that state were listening.

 

The Key to Educational Success: One Teacher Is Sufficient

Here is a nice piece of inspiration from the Huffington Post!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ronald-tiersky/educational-success_b_2277272.html

Time to reverse rural education decline

An interesting article about the rate at which schools have been closed in rural parts of China and its effects.

http://english.cqnews.net/html/2012-11/22/content_21695760.htm

China: snapshot of a decade

Hey guys,

Here’s a cool link to a Guardian page that displays some major changes in Chinese people’s lifestyle over the past decade. Check it out! 🙂

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/interactive/2012/nov/08/china-snapshot-of-a-decade?fb=native

Natural vs. Standard, Descriptive vs. Proscriptive

This “Ask the Editor” clip from Merriam-Webster provides some great food for thought on natural versus prescriptive language, what is “correct,” and how a language authority figure (whether dictionary editor or foreign English teacher) can and should balance the two.

Remember that natural language is language as acquired and produced by humans’ natural cognitive abilities – i.e. what people actually say.  Prescriptive language imposes [often arbitrary] rules that do not exist in natural language, but it is the only kind of language that is acceptable in writing for all but the most informal/unorthodox/creative settings.

 

China’s “left behind” children

Hey guys,

Thought you might be interested in this short BBC video about what happens to the children living and going to school in Anhui but whose parents are migrant workers elsewhere: China’s left behind children growing up without parents.

Opening Ceremonies at Xiuning Middle School

Lion King Rehearsal Photos

Dance Rehearals:


Music Rehearsals:


Costumes: