Encouraging Participation (and Note on E-mails)

This past semester I encouraged participation in my Communications for English Majors II class in many of the ways we discussed at conference; I was explicit about expectations and gave examples of what good participation looks like. Also, throughout the semester I gave specific, immediate praise to students who went beyond simply answering my questions (e.g., if they responded directly to what another student said by building on it/critiquing it, if they asked a question that was not solicited but was still on topic). All these things helped raise participation levels. Something else that increased participation dramatically however was when I sent out a ‘Participation Progress Report’ midway through the semester.

I sent out these reports in individual e-mails and in them praised students specifically for what they did well at with regards to participation (e.g., quality comments, consistent comments, building on what others said, critiquing what others said well, etc.), told them if their participation levels needed to increase (and roughly by how much), and how many absences/tardies they’d had. Additionally, if a student didn’t participate much but wrote excellent papers (several students fell into this category), I commented on how given the quality of her/his papers, s/he would contribute greatly to the class if s/he spoke up more. After sending out the reports, every student participated voluntarily at least once per class and most mid-level participators turned into high level participators. I’m not sure exactly why it worked (The praise? The knowledge that I was watching them closely? The reminder they were being graded in participation?) or how well it will work again, but at least for this semester, it worked very well.

A side note on e-mails though: I’m not sure what it’s like at other sites, but at least most of my students are used to more indirect feedback/are more sensitive to write I write in e-mails than their American counterparts might be. Because of this, I now make sure to add plenty of praise in my e-mails, to warn them of the directness of my feedback beforehand, and to be direct but gentle in my comments.

Saving money on a trip to Asia

by Elizabeth Weissberg
Here’s the article on how to save money on in-Asia trips that I mentioned at conference:
http://travel.nytimes.com/2011/03/20/travel/20prac-save.html?pagewanted=1&hpw
The most helpful part of the article may be the section on “air passes” for discounted travel on multi-destination trips (under the heading “Jetting Around Asia”).

Book Review: “How to Read a Book”

by Elizabeth Weissberg
Authors: Mortimer J. Adler and Charles Van Doren

How to Read a Book is a book that discusses exactly what its cover suggests it might–it contains a step by step description of how to read a book. It was assigned reading the summer before my senior year of high school, and although I read in ways in addition to those it suggests, it did make me a better active reader. This semester, the book has helped me with my teaching in two ways.

1) It’s what I used to prevent myself from reinventing the wheel–that is, in my English class, where we’re reading Brave New World, I taught my students some of its methods to use while they’re reading the novel.
2) It’s the book I recommend when a student in a class where I won’t be reading lit with them asks how to become a better reader.

There are a few drawbacks to the book.
1) It’s rather long.
2) It is perhaps overly focused on its step by step approach and begins to feel wearisomely meticulous and rule-heavy at points. At the same time, this is part of what makes it so useful–it’s really clear and leaves a strong impression as long as you can get through it.

Also, in the way many stodgy books are, it has its witty moments and can be quite funny at times.

The detailed table of contents is as good as any summary I could write here. The text of the book itself can be found here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27663860/Adler-Mortimer-J-Charles-Van-Doren-How-to-Read-a-Book-Rev-Upd-Ed-Schuster-1972